View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/schrodinger-s-cat-a-thought-experiment-in-quantum-mechanics-chad-orzel

Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, posed this famous question: If you put a cat in a sealed box with a device that has a 50% chance of killing the cat in the next hour, what will be the state of the cat when that time is up? Chad Orzel investigates this thought experiment.

Lesson by Chad Orzel, animation by Agota Vegso.

source

Subscribe

* indicates required

46 Comments

  • @SampleroftheMultiverse

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    AP Physics students looking for a STEM project may find this experiment simple enough to replicate.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcrey5jHGzA&t=15s

    The experiment may be used as part of their introduction to Quantum wave mechanics.

    Professionals also might want to replicate it in their Labs.

    Materials that are applicable to the process are relatively inexpensive and easy to attain.

    Compression or tensile testing equipment with digital or data chart recorders are commonly found and used in mechanical testing labs.

    Our experiment produces a visual representation of the probability amplitude for various energy levels.

    In quantum mechanic's particles in a 2d box,

  • @IlyassLakhili-uu8fm

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    how he knows i am wtching the video from my pc and not my phone 😐

  • @ManagementProfessor

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    These videos are so good:]

  • @sakismiou

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    the cat is equal parts alive OR dead, not alive AND dead.

  • @Paulakat517

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    What if all options are available both negative and positive and you don't choose you just focus.

  • @smilingtear

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Let me be the cat

  • @purrbox7514

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    This pops up once every few years in random conversation by people peddling weird pseudoscience. I know nothing about quantum mechanics, nor did I go to uni, but even I know that a cat will never exist in a state of superposition. Why? Because it's a cat, not a particle!

  • @theentangledperspective

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Not so intuitive explanation. Expected better quality video from TED-Ed.

  • @herbertripka9844

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Isn’t superposition merely a fancy word where we just don’t know what the state is yet? I.e., the cat is alive or dead. We just don’t know, until the lid is opened.

  • @CodieHolpp

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    The comments are the best laugh I will have this year! 😂

  • @lukeasacher

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Monty Python… Confuse-a-cat!

  • @fearitselfpinball8912

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Understanding Schrödinger’s cat, in my view, requires at minimum understanding that…

    1. It was a critique of something.

    2. It functions on logic that runs something like this:

    since we all agree that cats can’t be both alive and dead, therefore…

    3. Lastly, the words ‘can’t be’ in the sentence above (and in Schrödinger’s critique) must be understood as ‘it’s logically impossible’ (and therefore physically impossible) not merely as ‘it’s counter intuitive’.

    Without presenting these 3 basic features of the argument I doubt that the thought experiment can really be understood.

    It wasn’t devised to clarify that Schrödinger was ‘philosophically disturbed’ but rather to show that, logically, something must be wrong with our understanding of quantum theory (even if the math works).

  • @jamesm28

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Since you can't see me that means I'm both alive and dead and so are all of you. So is this comment coming from beyond the grave? There's a 50% chance…

  • @PraveenChristy-u5x

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Austrians always get credit for ideas which has no connection to the truth just like Sigmund Freud.

  • @BennyNegroFromQueens

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    So disturbing. IT MAKES NO SENSE!!!

  • @WalkingEnigma-b5i

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Wait but then the wave function is only provable for atoms and waves tho, that dosent prove his original cat box theory.

  • @YesIJohnFox

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    I have a simple solution to this problem… When an animal dies, it is possible to determine the approximate time of death, based on the state of decomposition… So If instead of opening the box after the device acted, open it 8 or 10 hours later… Even though one will only know the state of the cat upon opening the box, one will also be able to tell how long ago did the cat died based on the decomposition level, hence proving the cat's death was not dependent on any superposition state, it happened long before opening the box. 🙂

  • @reneybarra4646

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    “WHAT’S IN THE BOX?”

    Schrödinger: maybe your cat?

  • @TouhouMiravleMachine

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    "Our cat; almost is dead" *_My cat😂

    *Meant to be "-"

  • @SNOwyte

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    I saw wave pattern behavior on my cat when i was on acid

  • @lukeasacher

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    omg just found this after 10 years of your uploading- studied physics in hs at Oppenheimer's alma mater and until this moment, never properly understood Erwin's Dilemma. Thank you so much.

  • @rfeew

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    first time learning about this and its pretty crazy that this's how computers ended up being a real possibility

  • @KhaliunaaTumengerel

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    lovely!

  • @Harvey_Dent

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    You lost me after cat.

  • @wellsfam700

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    No just our knowledge of the cats life is unknown the cat is dead or alive before it’s opened

  • @alexanderizzard1254

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    So he could have just put a quarter in the box then? Shook it up and no dead cat 🤣

  • @Six3rdy

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Bruh you gotta love this guy for being such a goat. He gave quantum mechanics one of its founding principles, then said "Phuck this schitt, I'm awt!"

  • @dannzingadreamwork3743

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    But the cat observes itself before the box is open

  • @503neilunavailable9

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Youngs double slit experiment it is

  • @gearhead-442

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Put me in a box for an hour and when you open it I'll let you know you how dead I was

  • @ajai_p

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Schrödinger's mark
    You are both failed and passed in the same time until results out

  • @srigopalmukherji1897

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Too complex for my atrophied brain

  • @bjarterundereim3038

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Two things:
    1. Schroedinger himself saw this tought experiment as something of a joke. Ask Roger Penrose.
    2. This is not a thought experiment to "prove" quantum theory, but to show the impossibility of it.
    Then: Even as a boy (very young) I knew for a fact that I would not know what's in the chrismas present until I looked.
    Likewise, a sensible scientist would place a sensor in the box, to find the time of the activation of the radioactive device.
    Then he would know exactly at which time the cat would start dying.
    Besides, it may be a punishable offence to kill cats in this manner without permission.
    This fairytale called Scroedingers Cat, is just that. A fairytale to explain something absolutely different from what it really shows.
    In advertizing, this would be called a misrepresentation of the facts of the goods.
    Many parts of the quantum theories are like this. Are the so called scientists incapable of verbalizing their own findings?

  • @jaskiratsingh-ki7ps

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    So cat is aladeen or aladeen?

  • @MiaBella-b4r

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    @1:42 Lazarus effect

  • @JohnnyPillow

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Jokes on you im using my phone to watch

  • @mentalmickey1459

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    I think the cat is a bad example as it is not both alive and dead, it is one or the other but the information is not available.

  • @abdulhafizhmahfuddin4017

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    const [cat, catDied] = useState({isLive: true})

  • @bryaaaaaaaan

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    icl this is bs

  • @Peter-ni2ql

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    🎥📦↖️↗️↘️↙️↩️↪️🌌🧙🏻‍♂️🤷🏼🐆👉🏼🐘

  • @KO-lq1yo

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    So you don’t actually know if you have to take a dump until you sit on the toilet. It’s “Dump Uncertainty?”

  • @babosawina7626

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    Okay, but if yhu wait to open the box, and open it after 7years, yhu would be sure that the cat is one state “dead” time will tell if we use the cat, will it work the same with the quantum particles??

  • @dogslife5853

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    bro explained class 12 nuclear physics in one video

  • @TheNin-Jedi

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    I don't blame Schrödinger for thinking this is bs.

  • @Higgsevents

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    see what would make schrodinger know if the cat was alive or dead. as the video contains and says that there was a device that would make the cat dead. the device was radioactive, it would definitely make a sound when it will blast, if it would blast means that the cat is dead and if not cat is alive.

  • @RaptorInNewMexico

    02/15/2025 - 1:21 AM

    I now get the cat episode on Rick and Morty. 😊

Leave a Reply