Phillusion
PhillusionUncover the mysteries of time with Augustine of Hippo, Martin Heidegger, and Gilles Deleuze. Experience Augustine’s subjective time and its tie to memory. Discover Heidegger’s authentic time and the power of being present. Explore Deleuze’s multiplicity of temporalities and fragmented experiences. Embrace diverse perspectives on time, enriching your understanding. Join us on this philosophical journey through the tapestry of time.
Art By Pinterest
source
34 Comments
@smartarsetube
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMTime is the emergence of the past as factual truth without the reality of the present. The only material reality is the universal present, but everything changes when any one thing changes, this is how change anywhere forces time to emerge everywhere. Reality is everything that is subject to this consequence of change, and one of the side effects is gravity. The past is not real, only true, because the past is not subject to change. Time is not an illusion, because the past is true, it is our recall of the past that is fallible and often full of illusion.
@micheldisclafani2343
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMThere is only one type of time : ETERNITY . Our existence offers only a little taste of the eternity that we call time.
@wbiro
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AM1. A compendium of wrongheaded thinking. The comments here only add to it (albeit from smaller minds).
2. What is time? It is a measurement system that we use to track change — the change of the arrangement of atoms in the universe (or your area of interest). The past is composed of past arrangement sof atoms. The present is the present arrangement of atoms. The future will be composed of future arrangements of atoms.
3. If you want to visit the past, you do not want to engage in backwards time travel — that is a wrongheaded notion. If you want to go back in time, run your clock backwards. You want to go back in the arrangement of atoms in the universe (or, easier, your small area of interest). There are three ways: a.) push atoms backwards; b.) calculate it; c.) work from an atomic snapshot. The problem with pushing atoms backwards is that it destroys things in the present, so you are left with either calculating it or working from a snapshot.
@michaelpeterson8843
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMHe misses Heidegger's understanding of time. Heidegger spoke of temporality, as opposed to clock time, and that our Being, is time (temporality) embodied. Thus, time (temporality) has spatiality, and thus, the nature or ontology of our Being, acknowledges (even requires) our relationship to all entities. The narrator is sadly imposing his own view on Heidegger.
@doring4579
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AM🙂🌎⏳🙏♥️
@Demention94
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMDoes anyone know the artist at 3:53?
@dostoevsky523
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMPlease never stop making videos. You are doing great💪✨️
@kallianpublico7517
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMWhat is the difference between time and change? Consciousness is awareness of sameness and change only. Not time. Time is the inference that between our awareness of sameness and change there is a relationship. A continuous “reality” coinciding with our existence.
@brynbstn
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMNice effort. It's a good topic. Your text is a bit flowery, something with straight up rational writing is more appropriate to the topic, imo. Around the same time as Heraclitus we have Parmenides and his student Zeno, who challenged Heraclitus's ideas, basically stating that time and change are illusions. Zeno wrote some paradoxes to demo this. Aristotle refuted Zeno's paradoxes but emphasized that Time is dependent on Motion and vice versa. Plato thought, through the voice of Timaeus, that Time was part of creation. This theory has come back now with questions about Time before the Big Bang, or was created by the Big Bang. The new wave of experimental science of the 15th century refuted Aristotle's ideas about gravity, and we get new thoughts about time, space and motion, culminating with Newton who treated time/space as an absolute frame or reference, and infinite. Kant wrote about time/space in the context of idealism vs realism, resulting in his theory that it is the wiring of our minds that cause us to perceive space/time the way we do. No one took up the question again until Henri Bergson in 1889 with his book "Time and Free Will, which refuted the new wave of scientific materialism of the 19th century. He differentiated between authentic time i.e. “Duration” and the counted time of the scientists/mathematicians. He inspired Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Deleuze and many others.
@l.g.harris8505
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMI believe spirituality is real – virtuality is an illusion, a projection
@l.g.harris8505
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMAre memories real? Is the future real? I believe it’s a no to both questions. There is only now. There is power in presence and mindfulness. Theory: Time was the apple eve chose over God. To know the lie of time, created death.
@mcocreations_is_mitch_only
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMI seriously thought this video was going to be intersting as ****, but then it's so damn stupid and irrelevant.
👎👎👎
@devildoc492
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMSo many experts of time here and all are dated by a time of posting.
@mohhannif1683
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMFantastic exposition and revelation of intricate dimension and experience of authentic time.
@lauren1779
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMYou’re all over thinking it. Time simply does not exist.
@vthilton
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMTime is an illusion.
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMTime can be explained as a process of energy exchange formed by photon electron interactions. We have photon ∆E=hf electron couplings continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons as an uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future comes into existence. All it takes for this to be logical is for the spontaneous absorption and emission of light waves to precedes absolutely everything that happens in our three-dimensional world.
@meboogalooga
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMWouw you need more attention if you keep going
@tomaszniemirowski
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMIn my opinion, time is the creative activity of God.
@rswow
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMPlease cut the incessant music.
@czarquetzal8344
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMA philosophy of history is incomplete without a consideration of the philosophy of time.
@zeroonetime
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMTry Infinity Squared.
T.E.N. The Eternal Now 010 dimensions
@alwaysgreatusa223
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMHow can you comprehend any fundamental concept, when a fundamental concept is itself the means by which you comprehend ?
@alwaysgreatusa223
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMThe statement 'a man steps in the same river twice' is only meaningful if there is a man and a river. But a man by definition is something that lives beyond a single moment, and a river by definition is something that flows constantly. So, once you take-away the passing of time, you take-away the meaningfulness of the statement. It is not false, it is just meaningless. In order for it to be true or false, it would have to first be meaningful. If there is a man, and if there is a river, then it becomes a real possibility that he might or might not step into the same river twice. He might step into the river once, and step into it again, thus making the statement true; or, he might only step into the river once, withdraw his foot, and never step into it again, in which case the statement would be false. But to say a man cannot step into the same river twice because neither one endures is nonsense, for stepping itself is something that requires time, as does the existence of the man and the river. Take-away the passing of time, and you take-away the context in which the statement is meaningful. This kind of word-play belongs in Wonderland with the White Rabbit and the Mad Hatter, and it is mere sophistry to take Heraclitus literally.
Of course, it can be maintained that Heraclitus is just using a metaphor here. Now, strangely, his point seems to be akin to that of Parmenides and Zeno — who are supposed to be his polar opposites. Time, motion and change are not real for Parmenides and Zeno because Being simply exists and it is the only thing that exists, thus there is nothing else for it to become, or to change into, (and, as they would have it), time itself must be illusion, for time is simply a kind of change, but change is, (as we have seen in their theory) impossible. Now, Heraclitus, in contrast, is supposed to believe that change is the only reality, and Being (or permanence) is only an illusion. But, as the first paragraph above demonstrates, without endurance (meaning existence over a period of time), there is nothing in existence in the first place that can possibly change. In other words, Heraclitus' notion of 'pure change' is absurd ! No less absurd is Parmenides and Zeno's idea of 'absolute permanence'. 'Permanence' itself is only meaningful in the context of the passing of time. So, both positions turn-out to be a denial of time, motion, real change, and real permanence, and even real existence in any form whatsoever. Which is to say, they are both utter nonsense !
@HumanBeanbag
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMI think about gravity a lot.
@edwardlawrence5666
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMTime is the awareness, feeling and measure of motion, of things that are before and after. Thanks Aristotle!
@mrcat3493
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMGreat video. Would Augustine of Hippo be categorized as part of "phenomenologist" line of thinkers then?
@liasplace4607
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMWhen we look up at the night sky we are looking into the past.
@aaditghodke
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMGreat videos on your channel
@GegeGege-q4c
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMKeep it up 😊 amazing
@VOIDEARTH_Official
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMAmazing content! Very precise and well spoken! Keep it up!
Have a great day!
@That_Freedom_Guy
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMWe mistake entropic change, for time. We mistake memory for the past and anticipation for the future. In fact all we really have is one, eternal now. Time is fixed, it is objects that flow. The present DOESN'T slip immediately away to anywhere! Those are just words we have learnt to repeat. Look for yourself and see! The present is the most fixed and stable thing in this objective world on fire with entropic flux. This is valid. If not, show me, please. 😐
@Johanliebertwife
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMIstg I wrote my own theory bout time and thought of making a YouTube video, next day this came to my feed.
@mohamedahnach3692
03/02/2025 - 9:15 AMkeep making videos, love your content 👍👍👍