Albert Einstein said that what he wanted to know was “God’s thoughts,” which is a metaphor for the ultimate and most basic rules of the universe.  Once known, all other phenomena would then be a consequence of these simple rules.  While modern science is far from that goal, we have some thoughts on how this inquiry might unfold.  In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln tells what we know about GUTs (grand unified theories) and TOEs (theories of everything).

source

37 Comments

  • @Seiftechie

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    maybe ask Thoth the egyptian god of knowledge

  • @frun

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Are those running of the couplings dispersion relations? 6:10

  • @Dan13Speed

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    GOGUT – Discovered by in 1990 by Dr. Gabriel Oyibo. Stop looking. Its been found.

  • @gagutjoy

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    This has been accomplished by a Professor from Nigeria named Dr Gabriel Audu Oyibo

  • @Edruezzi

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    The gravitational and electromagnetic forces were known from prehistory. The strong and weak forces were noted only in the twentieth century. Perhaps the problem is that the touted great feat of unification must proceed at a more profound layer than those of the known four, with the four at most tangential to the processes that shape the vast saga.

    Any unsolicited comments will bring on the blockage of the author and the deletion of the post.

  • @zakirhussain-js9ku

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    There can't be such a theory since almost everything in this universe requires its own theory. Moreover no theory is perfect and exceptions have to be made to it at some level.

  • @mdaaaa2551

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Pls visit L. Rahman Grand Unified Model.

  • @wolfboyft

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Great ending :3

  • @evguenimigatchevsanchez4649

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Im not a physicist, just a failing student with insomnia 🙂

  • @realityreality9004

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    This info came directly from Dr.Gabriel Oyibo who discovered all of this information

  • @2REACTION4U

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    TUG live

  • @2REACTION4U

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    HUDS N SHOULDRS

  • @florh

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Do you believe in this grand unified theory doctor Lincoln? I'm trying to understand as to why there must be a G.U.T. in the first place, why forces must have been combined when the universe was born. What are we trying to make it fit because the calculations otherwise don't add up? Do you believe the universe was indeed first a hot dense soup of matter and energy before electroweak symmetry breaking?

  • @stephencarlsbad

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Scientists will never find a unified theory of everything simply because they are coming at the problem from a fundamental "newtonian-relativity" perspective.
    They get into further trouble when they try to solve the problem from a purely quantum perspective, and thus they can't figure out how these two domains of physics align.
    Physics does align. But not from any of the physics known perspectives. The key to solving this disunified problem is in Einsteins equation e=mc2.

  • @soul4saken

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Good summary. I somewhat understand now

  • @danielumarov8841

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    i will make the shirt

  • @MrDarkwing78

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    I have figured out the GUT. No idea if it extends to the TOW yet! Keep an eye on the science papers, it’s going to be big, especially as it suggests “The Big Bang” is actually wrong!

  • @KidThaMessenger

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Why didn't he's say a African Mathematics discover this??? Hmmm

  • @mkryza

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    I enjoyed t this so much!

  • @gilgil9284

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Es posible traducirlo al español, seria muy complicado, nos ayudaría mucho, vale la pena esta muy bien presentado FELICIDADES.

  • @Juan-gs2by

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    I’m a criminal Justice major and I’m here because of Young Sheldon. This is a very helpful and understanding video

  • @solapowsj25

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Failure to identify neutron waves and graviton corpuscle would be an incomplete 🧀 🐀unity.

  • @airforcemax

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    ¡pondering and wondering at 9:16 pm Pacific DayLight Savings Time on Saturday, 19 March 2022 Common Era or CE formerly known as Ano Domini or AD!

  • @phillipramirez8476

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    This has been solved. It's was done in 1990 by Dr. Gabriel Oyibo. The equation is Gij,j=0 (GAGUT) GOD ALMIGHTY GRAND UNIFIED THERIOM. Not theory, but theriom .

  • @paulatreides9806

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    ok but i need to know what does his shirt says , KEEP CALM AND ___RYO__ ??

  • @nurlatifahmohdnor8939

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    What is a nonzero mass neutrino?

  • @tresajessygeorge210

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN…!!!

  • @SpotterVideo

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:

    When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.

    Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons.

    Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles.

    Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

  • @jonathanjollimore4794

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    …0_o

  • @neonblack211

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    I can't stand the camera switching if its meant to be comical or not… I don't want to fee like I'm watching the evening news when im watching physics videos… other than that I love your content, thanks

  • @traruhsynred3475

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Why is meeting at GUT scale evidence of GUT? If they are coupling vs. energy curves are not straight lines and change monotonically they are bound to meet somewhere even if completely unrelated to each other. If one starts high (strong) and one low (electroweak) and the big one goes monotonically down and monotonically up they'll me at a higher energy somewhere. That's not an amazing coincidence.

  • @idoittinkeringprojects9893

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Maybe, i ve stumbled on something.

    There is no strong nuclear force.

    Atoms balance their nuclear force between their
    electrons n protons. The protons in the nucluei r effectively neutralised by its corresponding electrons in orbit. The orbit is the neutral energy field between attraction and repulsion.

    In the orbital field, there r 2 kinetics of the electron movements .

    1. Its revolution around its atomic nucleus.

    2. Its spin around its axis.

    The 2 kinetics manifest into energy impulses.

    1. The revolution kinetics impart Electrical impulses. 2.The spinning kinetics impart Magnetic impulses.

    This phenomenon is seen combined as electromagnetic impulses.

    The electro magnetic impulses r picked up by elastic spacetime and get reverberated Rippling outwards as electromagnetic waves.

    The waves are rippled to a spectrum of frequencies n wavelengths, in proportion to the intensity of the impulses.

    At low intensity, the waves are long as in radio waves. At high intensity , it is as short as in gamma rays. In between, theres a small section of the intensity of visible light waves.

    And from here, is speculated over gravity. Perhaps, the intensity out of electrons kinetics at unexcited levels of temperatures will also generate electromagnetic waves. N these waves r much longer than radio waves and manifest as GRAVITY waves. In other words, GRAVITY is Electronmagnetic in nature. Just as light is.

    This insight also reconciles to the quest of GUT.

  • @Momo-bb2fn

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    I hope that we find it in my lifetime.

  • @coloradobrad6779

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    7:27 This did not go unnoticed. 👏👏

  • @nachiketakumar9645

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Sir please can you tell me the name of 1960 unification experiment 4:00

  • @aK00742

    03/07/2025 - 5:27 PM

    Loved it! Thank you for your efforts.

Leave a Reply