(September 24, 2012) Leonard Susskind gives a broad introduction to general relativity, touching upon the equivalence principle.
This series is the fourth installment of a six-quarter series that explore the foundations of modern physics. In this quarter, Leonard Susskind focuses on Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity.
Stanford University:
Stanford Continuing Studies Program:
http://csp.stanford.edu/
Stanford University Channel on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/stanford
source
46 Comments
@thanhquannguyen9624
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMAwesome ! Thanks a lot !
@xavierterri3014
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM●EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IN 6 STEPS
DOES GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION DEPEND ON VELOCITY?
Argumentative schematism of Einstein's General Relativity (each step is a consequence of the preceding step):
1) Einstein's Equivalence Principle
2) Gravitational motion equations: geodesics DU = 0
3) The gravitational potential is represented by the spacetime metric itself: which guarantees, since the covariant derivatives of the spacetime metric are null, that the gravitational motion equations are given by the geodesics DU = 0 of the Einstein Principle of Equivalence
4) Gravitational Field Equations: These are the so-called Einstein Equations, which are built on the prejudice that the tetradimensional gravitational potential is represented (again in accordance with the Equivalence Principle) by the spacetime metric itself
5) Solution of Einstein's Equations for the symmetrically spherical stationary gravitational field: Schwarzschild metric
6) Zeros and mathematical infinities in spacetime metrics. "Broken" spacetime. Theoretical prediction of black holes and event horizons
Reasonable doubts:
1) What would happen if the four-dimensional gravitational potential was not represented by the spacetime metric itself, but adding another new potential related with tetravelocity? : http://vixra.org/abs/1510.0137
2) What would happen if Einstein's Principle of Equivalence were not rigorously true? :
https://vixra.org/abs/1510.0135
●La gravedad es una tetrafuerza. Con esta concepción se pueden describir coherentemente los 3 test clásicos
●ESCAPE VELOCITY ACCORDING TO THE 3 THEORIES OF GRAVITY
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1FRHkFhhVt/
@HbdIsjjs
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMTropis symbiosis loupertevardermiton since adap tivity purbanuergazodierimiceral benua vetebranamevaldekonther GANDITA 2 😊
@UNKanos
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMI dont understand how jews can be so unlikable without even trying
@mario.caseiro
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM21:21 so professor can I say that the time is the amount of or related into the distortion of space vectors known? If you have a huge amount of mass (energy) it will cause such distortion in space that time can reach the limit towards zero. If less energy (mass therefore less gravity the time flows slowly cause the acceleration "a" is slower so for an piece of space change its state takes more time.
Imagine a fictional scenario where each voxel in the universe is contained a fixed amount of a kind of liquid cristal like in the LCD television s pixels. Let's call the imaginary Liquid cristal as Aether Lumineferous. So in the same way as tv it takes a time to transverse a line in the tv space. Soh time can be a measurement of space do to the fixed refresh rate of the TV screen. So assuming in this fictional scenario the C constant would be the refresh rate of the changing state of the aether Lumineferous contained on each voxel.
Can I think Time as a 4th space vectors sir?
@BoAstrom-q4c
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMGeneral relativity should be called jewish bullshit
Nothing else
@yashaswinigargav7732
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMI watched this video almost ten years ago in a dinggy cybercafe Makin notes I can't believe it appeared on my time line again ❤❤
@Eugeniodimitrio
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM-')°_ iSSCOLAS NO TEMPO Di BOSSTONG OBiJESSAM ENiGUiMA GARANTiDO POVO NO ASSUNTO
@PitViperX1977
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMThis is amazing! Thank you Stanford for posting! First John Elway, now this. Much appreciation!
@МарияТаран-с8щ
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWhat about transformation that goes like this:
Z’ = Z – C/(x^2+y^2+z^2)^(1/2)*t^2 -mimicking the gravitational field dependency?
@onetruekeeper
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMRecent astophysics research suggests that the universe is flat and not curved like Einstein thought it was. Much to the horror of relativists there are straight lines in space.
@GregZO6
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMI paid attention in 7th grade Science Class, so this is old news
@moc5541
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWell, he's no Menahem Max Schiffer. I refer to a certain former student of Erwin Schrödinger who, in about 1970, taught this course at Stanford. I was his grader then. He had been told by Schrödinger that he had to make up his mind and decide on whether he was to become a physicist or a mathematician. He chose the latter, yet taught GR from the math department. He was stunningly articulate and his penmanship on the board was astoundingly good. And he, with Ronald Adler and Maurice Bazin, wrote an introductory book on the subject.
@arun120977
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMOutstanding.
@PeterDB90
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMI feel like I need to take a few courses before I'm at a point where I can understand this. Let's hope Brilliant can get me there, then I'll come back here to watch it.
@111usul
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMby the end it got mental, crazy minds
@longerino
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWhat watch is he wearing?
@Qsaucetheboss
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWhat are the pre-reqs for this video😂?
@ionfeld
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMEvery 2 years I end up watching this guy
@lawrenceclyons
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMFreeman Dyson wrote the forward to the "Quotable Einstein".
@stevecostello4278
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWow, that guy is really smart
@sblazie
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM"Now I know you know this. I know you know all about this" 😅
@stepaushi
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMFirst he says he'll ignore special relativity because he'll deal only with slow speeds relative to light. Then around 26:00 he starts talking about light within this framework 😳
@stepaushi
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM10:52 You don't get nothing; you get zero.
@root576
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMlook at this beautiful brilliant environment, teacher and school. why did you reject me? I was a qualified applicant according to all of my counsellors and I just wanted to study there, to learn these amazing facts about my interest area. and whats the outcome? “I am very sorry to inform you….” just fuck it, sometimes I wanna say but I cant because I just wanted (and still do want) to get in there so bad. there has to be a way to solve all of this mess, fuck this
@LoversGrief
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWhy won't he just stop eating during his classes?
@selahattinkara-o5h
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMvery good.👏🌺
@AnonYmous-ry2jn
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMIs shirt is too big relative to his body.
@GPSPYHGPSPYH-ds7gu
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMSuper intelligence and my study already super scientific real worlds. ET
@grampa-gaming
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMThank you Stanford for sharing ❤ knowledge is power
@SajjadKhan-cn6mv
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMsusskind seems almost apologetic these days teaching people physics and being a physicist
@ilvaporizzatore
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMNon sapevo che giorgione facesse pure il prof di fisica
@Totozme
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM"The laws of physics" you know, the ones that not include 95% of what the universe is made of
@davidmorse3190
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM"I'm not a physics professor but I have been in an elevator."
@MADNESS084
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMConsciousness is fundamental. Relativity is DEAD!!!
@lillticky
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMAnyone else not studying this at all but just watching it at 4am cause its more interesting than what you're actually studying?
@davsaltego
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMI love listening to Professor Ehrmantraut
@magnusqwerty
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWorst teacher, I have seen for a long time.
@PointofUncertainty
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMLoved it!
@BreezeTalk
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMThis guy was really good
@comacuma2869
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMWhat hav u seen supreme in ure self
@comacuma2869
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMPile of bone formatio showered with testostrone,,,other than that whaat is greaat in this french ,,germaan maan
@Neb2117
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PM….we still haven’t gotten off the ground.
@9999afshin
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMThanks
@Mohsenmusicpoetry
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMLike
@richardreeder
03/14/2025 - 6:39 PMMy brain checked out at 08:30. How did everyone else get on?