The geometry of chaos can explain our uncertain world, from weather and pandemics to quantum physics and free will.

This talk was recorded at the Ri on 21 April 2023.

Join Tim Palmer as he explores how it provides the means to predict the world around us, and provides new insights into some of the most astonishing aspects of our universe and ourselves.

Watch the Q&A here: https://youtu.be/VZQnFQAJ6Io
Subscribe for regular science videos: http://bit.ly/RiSubscRibe

00:00 Introduction
00:55 Illustrating Chaos Theory with pendulums (demo)
02:44 Fractal geometry: A bridge from Newton to 20th Century mathematics
08:43 The three great theorems of 20th Century mathematics
11:24 The concept of State Space
14:43 Lorenz State Space
19:24 Cantor’s Set and the prototype fractal
22:52 Hilbert’s Decision Problem
24:04 The link between 20th Century mathematics and fractal geometry
27:21 The predictability of chaotic systems
32:26 Predicting hurricanes with Chaos Theory
43:44 The Bell experiment: proving the universe is not real?
51:45 Counterfactuals in Bell’s theorem
56:29 Applying fractals to Bell’s theorem
01:03:57 The end of spatial reductionism

Buy Tim’s book ‘The Primacy of Doubt’ here: https://geni.us/5bgfg

Tim Palmer is a Royal Society Research Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of Oxford. Following a PhD in general relativity theory, he spent much of his career working on the predictability and dynamics of weather and climate, developing probabilistic ensemble prediction systems across a range of weather and climate timescales. He also researches the foundations of quantum physics, in addition to applications of quantum and imprecise computing. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society and an International Member of the US National Academy of Sciences. Amongst other awards, he has won the Institute of Physics Dirac Gold Medal, and the top medals of the American and European Meteorological Societies.


A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:

modsiw, Anton Ragin, Edward Unthank, Robert L Winer, Andy Carpenter, William Hudson

Don McLaughlin, efkinel lo, Martin Paull, Ben Wynne-Simmons, Ivo Danihelka, Kevin Winoto, Jonathan Killin, Stephan Giersche, William Billy Robillard, Jeffrey Schweitzer, Frances Dunne, jonas.app, Tim Karr, Alan Latteri, David Crowner, Matt Townsend, THOMAS N TAMADA, Andrew McGhee, Paul Brown, David Schick, Dave Ostler, Osian Gwyn Williams, David Lindo, Roger Baker, Rebecca Pan

The Ri is on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/TheRoyalInstitution
and Twitter: http://twitter.com/ri_science
and Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/royalinstitution
and TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ri_science
Listen to the Ri podcast: https://anchor.fm/ri-science-podcast
Our editorial policy: https://www.rigb.org/editing-ri-talks-and-moderating-comments
Subscribe for the latest science videos: http://bit.ly/RiNewsletter

Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won’t cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.

source

45 Comments

  • @bioxbiox

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    This lecture brought me a so much pleasure for the mind. It is so well presented and narrated that such a complicated matter is easily understandable even for nonspecialists.

  • @richardgalea9884

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    The number 1(one) metaphysically represents a photon……..It cannot be subdivided! ……Forget Cantor’s infinities!

  • @berg0002

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Eautiful how you visualise a property of a space defined by interrelationships of points in space, where not the so-called attractor attracts, but rather the relationships in their dynamics prohibit the system to go there.

  • @richardchapman1592

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Surely we should consider in Bell experiments that when there are entangled particles there is one pair at one beam splitter and another pair at another beam splitter. You have actually selected out pairs of particles that only have the characteristics of seeming entangled. One possibility for that is if there is a transverse random walk element taking each particle on a path slightly offbeam and only those appearing to have related characteristics get measured then go slightly offbeam to the next beam splitter or detector and are not selected there but another pair is.

  • @marjola-t8h

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Climat change is not caused by humanity, the impact of huminity is negligible. It is just ideology not science. Climate is not predictable

  • @luizaquino559

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    You have to analyze five dimensions to work wirh Derivatives: Actual Price, Strike Price, Time to Delivery, Volatility of the Ative and Interest Rate. ( Black and Scholes Formula )

  • @p1ll4r

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    🙂

  • @chandrapalsingh5573

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    I think the world is still deterministic, for the fact small changes too occur, following laws of physics, changing the whole products…but I think, our inability to calculate small changes, doesn't means it is not deterministic.

  • @jamielacourse7578

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Finally…..something to watch that isn't insulting to the intelligence.

  • @isatousarr7044

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Chaos theory and geometry are fascinating fields that, together, can provide profound insights into understanding the complexities of the natural world. Chaos theory, a branch of mathematics, deals with systems that appear to be disordered or random but are actually governed by deterministic laws. These systems are highly sensitive to initial conditions a property known as the "butterfly effect." This means that even tiny changes in the starting point of a system can lead to vastly different outcomes over time, making long-term prediction extremely difficult.

    Geometry, on the other hand, provides a mathematical framework to study the shapes, spaces, and structures that form the basis of many natural and physical systems. In chaos theory, concepts like fractals and strange attractors use geometric structures to illustrate how chaotic systems behave. These geometric patterns reveal that even in seemingly unpredictable environments, there are underlying structures and rules that govern the behavior of the system.

    While chaos theory and geometry cannot predict the future with absolute certainty due to their sensitivity to initial conditions, they can help us understand the underlying principles and patterns that drive complex systems. For example, weather forecasting uses chaotic models to predict short-term weather patterns, and in physics, chaos theory can explain phenomena in fluid dynamics, planetary orbits, and even some aspects of biological systems.

    However, when it comes to long-term predictions, chaos theory shows that even small errors in measurement can compound and lead to unpredictable outcomes, limiting our ability to make precise forecasts over extended periods. Geometry can aid in visualizing and interpreting these chaotic behaviors, helping scientists identify recurring patterns and the geometric properties that underpin complex phenomena.

    In essence, while chaos theory and geometry don't provide us with crystal-clear predictions of how the world will behave in the future, they allow us to gain a deeper understanding of the rules and structures that govern complex systems. This knowledge can lead to better models and strategies for dealing with unpredictable phenomena in fields like meteorology, ecology, economics, and more, offering insights that help us navigate the uncertainties of our world.

  • @JamesGibson-p1m

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Absolutely outstanding – thank you.

  • @johnlewis5330

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    What an amazing lecture.

  • @PhilCallis

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    A cosmological fractal attractor would seem like a huge ask if the alternative wasn’t a multiverse

  • @ryangraffius1474

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    It’s a mid/side geometric transformation from 2D to 4D. No 3D interaction. We use this in audio for printing vinyl records.

    The needle will skip out of the ‘sides’ if there is too much Low End. The Low end is moved into the ‘depth’.

    Not unlike magnetic dipole, the ‘sides’ are stereophonic and the mid remains monophonic

    X+Y = M. correlated information
    X-Y= S. Uncorrelated information

    This becomes the bell curve of mid/side probabilities.

    S + M +(-)S as dual’ correlated pathways.

    fractal form. (As above, So below)

    As a convention (like the direction electrical current travels) we have to choose…

    Inside out to outside in (3D) or (4D)
    Outside in to inside out (4D) or (3D)

    Which one we choose alters the use case of the fractal geometry.

    And thus, we begin to understand the ‘musical’ organizational principle of the cosmology. Because it is scalular (not scalar) in nature.

  • @BlergleslinkVettermoo

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Great lecture, but Palmer may have been in error about a point of history: it wasn't Newton but Kepler who discovered that planetary orbits are elliptical.

  • @mandem7177

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Really good, I like them deep and this is DEEP

  • @ulyssesk7325

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    jsut asd lucy

  • @ulyssesk7325

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    i plasyed very silent music to break th time loop dont blame me

  • @ulyssesk7325

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    yeah i guess that you if you are lazy like chaos teory

  • @SaveSoilSaveSoil

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    The gravity demonstration is beautiful! Thank you!

  • @Peter_Telling

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Thanks!

  • @Czeckie

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    im not sure I buy it, but it's definitely an interesting and creative idea

  • @jameswoodard2232

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Kinda??? Good theory… terrible English.

  • @psolien

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Just another of those cases where a good scientist makes for a horrible science communicator ! No shame in that. It's a separate skill and very few people can do both. Dr Palmer …not one of those people. If you already understand the theory robustly enough, you can figure out what he means to say…otherwise, it may be quite missleading

  • @RichardDavis-wk3tx

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    chaos theory can't make sense of the 3 body problem

  • @sylvan186

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Many thoughts arising from this!

  • @Jersey-towncrier

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    The world is simple, but perceiving makes it not so…

  • @ruelapas6240

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Too many chitchat. I wish it was direct to the point,

  • @andrejgrebenc3235

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Climate Change can be uncomputable!!!

  • @Am33304

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    I don’t know why, but the sight of a well-dressed, well-spoken man, holding forth and gesturing with his body and hands to an audience, in this hall, discussing physics and composing thought experiments and introducing graphic representations of the material he’s talking about, strikes me as ludicrous. At first glance I wanted to punch his face. I don’t understand this impulse, but I take notice of it for a later date perhaps.

    Now, since this is a physics site, I anticipate scornful rebukes and personal insults to follow as replies, but since I don’t receive notifications of replies, you’ll be wasting your spite. But if you get nothing positive from this comment, I think that’s too bad. Everything is potentially relevant in the observational habits of the best scientists.

  • @klyanadkmorr

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    ITA kinda been guessing that just learning abt Fractal math and how it could be used to represent physics chemistry. Spooky action at a distance is that all our perceived reality matter is underlying connected in subspace effecting each other through emergent forces energy

  • @ddtt1398

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    A measurement involves a phase transition where the macroscopic pointer variable of the apparatus goes from the initial metastable state to one of the stable states. Not doing an experiment means that nothing happens. Counterfactuals do not make sense. Getting the whole universe in the argumenting, means that they don't have any clue.

  • @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Geometry of Chaos at first sight appear a repeated module or a pattern. Lorenz attacter make the predictive pattern. Bell's theorem and a pattern in correlation naturally bring the subject towards future of physics. Uniform field near earth or heavenly body always sense a charge of G .
    G is geometry of chaos or stochastic or a pattern in randomness. A riddle that flipped between Einstein and Newton now need a third leap like third reference or party of Bell's.
    A quality lecturer makes me satisfied with few new results into gravity .
    Sir Penrose namaste from me to all of you
    & 2020.

  • @theosmid8321

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    The tilted table flabbergasted me in the sense that I could not imagine a better example of how things work within the range of probability and keeping them in a frame of reference. Very well done!

  • @JosephKings-j9f

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    this guy has a mind that can work better but doesnt because of his pay, lot of potential.

  • @JosephKings-j9f

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    making maths boring is a sin, but interesting stuff here.

  • @zeroonetime

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Infinity Squared I.S. 010 Geometric Chaos.

  • @MYNAME_ABC

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    The political climate about that globalists "climate change" pretext for carbon tax, global pauperisation, control, surveillance and ultimately enslavement will change as soon as the chaotic probability for freedom and prosperity for most individuals statistically gets smaller and smaller, while the globalists keep riding their luxurious private jets to the "climate change" conferences, where the food and prostitutes are luxurious. Votes around the globe will change the political climate soon, as more and more feel threatened to live their ordinary lives! At least that is mankinds hope…

  • @Jszar

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    RI talks usually have clear, crisp audio, even when the recording is quite old. Unfortunately, they seem to have been having trouble this time around. I found that the background crackle and muddiness made it very difficult to figure out what the speaker was saying. (That said, I have known audio processing issues.)

  • @michaelc3977

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Notice how he said it would be very difficult to predict the motion of the double pendulum. Very difficult, but NOT impossible. This is because everything IS predictable. Chaos does NOT exist in this reality. EVERYTHING happens according to the laws of physics. There are no miracles. There are NO spontaneous events which take place outside the bounds of physics. EVERYTHING is predictable if all the variables are known. There is NO free will. There is NO chaos.

  • @Techtonix954

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    If you could see "chaos theory" you would see no chaos at all. They should rename that. 😅 Actually, they will one day.

  • @EdT.-xt6yv

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM
  • @euclidofalexandria3786

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    Energy as plasma has five fundamental nodes, it can be stored compressed in a fractal space when space is deformed…there are sets of geometries for classes of archaic black holes, they could be dark matter. once an event occurs, they might exlode… or explode and persist…

  • @anmolagrawal5358

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    14:35 Finally got his first laugh out of the audience. I was honestly feeling bad for him because there had been no response before this

  • @dosesandmimoses

    03/01/2025 - 3:11 PM

    I enjoyed this lecture!

Leave a Reply